Not everyone carrying an axe is a lumberjack
Ever seen a lumberjack in a casino? Not likely, since most lumberjacks do not carry their axes generally around with them on nights out. But two stories have popped up in the media showing that non-lumberjacks don’t stick to these necessarily rules.
Axing For Trouble
The first of these two tales of violence took place in a town bar in Fontaniva, Italy, in which a disgruntled gambler decided to exact their revenge on some naive slots machines after losing 5,000 euros (over $6,500) in 2 weeks.
The father of two, aged 48, was caught on CCTV cameras, footage of which has since stormed the media and video clip streaming web sites, where audiences can watch the gambler smash up seven machines as nearby customers dive for cover.
The machine hacker calmly strolls out of the bar, but not before giving a thumbs up towards the one-armed bandits after blowing off steam. Either this is a sign of victory, or a show of friendship towards these machines that are particular. When dealing with crazy, interpretations are anyone’s guess.
The anger-released slot axe-murderer then waited calmly for arrest outside a nearby bar.
‘ He comes in here all the right time to relax and play the machines,’ said who owns the bar, whom chose probably wisely- to remain nameless. ‘ He’s had some wins, but he spends a great deal of money. He’s a laborer and only works any now and then.’ evidently, that is one worker whom keeps his equipment that is own handy.
‘He’s normally a tremendously man that is quiet. He just stepped in really calmly having an axe and smashed all the machines. There were several customers by them at that time plus they had been terrified,’ he included.
As a result of his strangely calm yet violent outburst, the man was sentenced for half a year for criminal damage and control of an offensive weapon. But jail overcrowding got him off with absolutely nothing more than a slap on the hand.
But Wait, There’s More…
The second among these two stories is really a bit more frightening, because the axe was wielded not during the slots, but at a member of the employees at a wagering store in the Welsh capital of Cardiff.
Police reported that the ‘particularly violent’ incident left the shop assistant at a Ladbrokes shop that is betting Cardiff ‘in circumstances of shock.’
Before raiding the till and making down with some money, one of three suspects in the robbery was seen wielding an axe over their head, threatening the Ladbrokes’ worker with injury or even worse if he didn’t comply.
A police spokesperson investigating the criminal activity said that two men, both wearing ski masks, entered the bookie’s shop at 9:30 pm regarding the nights the incident. One calmly stood guard at the doorway, while the other violently threatened the associate utilizing the tree-chopping gun.
The frightened shop assistant then handed over what police described as a ‘quantity of cash,’ and also the men fled the scene in a getaway car driven by way of a third suspect.
Police are now appealing to the local public for information that could help apprehend the violent criminals, as unlike the Italian axe-wielder, they certainly did perhaps not wait calmly for arresting officers to show up on the scene.
Whose Casino Could It Be Anyhow? Boston and Everett, Mass. Duke It Out
The battle continues over who gets to vote on Everett casino plan
While each and every of the 3 certification battles for casino resort projects in Massachusetts has received its share of drama, none has proven more contentious than the fight over the casino slated to be located in the greater Boston area. Now, one Boston candidate that is mayoral threatening a lawsuit over one particular proposal that would put a casino within the neighboring town of Everett.
The appropriate option is linked to the idea that neighboring communities is afflicted with casino projects, but won’t have an opportunity to vote on whether those casinos ought to be opened in the place that is first. Suffolk District Attorney Daniel F. Conley, a candidate for mayor of Boston, is one of the handful of prospects whom have suggested that most of Boston should manage to vote on a casino that could be based in East Boston, as an example.
It is unfair to the surrounding communities when it comes to the proposed Wynn casino project in Everett, Conley says that allowing only Everett residents to vote on. Should the East Boston proposal fail, then, he would register suit to stop the Everett casino based in the impact it could have on many Boston neighborhoods.
‘The Wynn proposal had been voted…on in just one single community,’ Conley said within a press conference at City Hall Plaza, ‘while residents and businesses from Charlestown to Somerville and beyond will keep its traffic, economic, and social burdens but receive none of the proposed advantages.’
According to the state laws that produced the chance for three casinos that are new Massachusetts, only communities hosting casinos actually get yourself a vote on whether or not to permit the projects to be built. However, casino designers are needed to negotiate compensation, with arbitration needed if the casinos and local governments can’t arrive at a resolution by themselves.
Conley has proposed going for a path that isn’t actually outlined in the 2011 casino law in terms of the East Boston casino proposal, one that is being manufactured by Caesars Entertainment and Suffolk Downs. He would have the complete city of Boston vote on whether to approve the proposal, while still giving East Boston veto power within the vote that is entire. The casino would have to pass votes in both East Boston alone and across the entire city in order to be approved in other words.
Yay or Nay?
While Conley hasn’t specified whether or not he supports the East Boston casino proposition, a Boston world survey found that six for the eight mayoral candidates who answered that question were in support of it, with just two coming down against it (with Conley and one other candidate not answering the question). Meanwhile, four of ten candidates supported allowing the whole city to vote on the casino, while six favored limiting the vote to just East Boston. Another poll of Boston residents unearthed that 44% were and only the casino, while 37% opposed it.
Even when voters back these proposals, only one will ultimately be chosen by the state as the future site of a casino in the Boston area. Along with the Everett and East Boston casino plans, there is also a contending proposal from Crossroads Massachusetts to place a casino in Milford.
Labour MP Disses Sports Books, Takes Donation from Retired Bookie CEO
Chuka Umunna, taken to task for accepting donation
Chuka Umunna, cited as the increasing celebrity of the united kingdom’s Labour Party who has publicly announced his discontent towards the bookmaking industry got his or her own hand caught in the sports book cookie jar after accepting a donation of £20,000 (more than $30,000) from the retired leading recreations company that is betting.
Slaps Bookies While Accepting Donation
As a betting store critic whom has publicly decried the number of betting shops, Umunna however accepted the large contribution from chairman emeritus of the Gala Coral Group, Neil Goulden, causing members of the Conservative Party to call the shadow business secretary out, claiming Umunna is guilty of adopting double standards.
Since Gala Coral Group is certainly one of this largest bookies in Britain and accounts for a many betting outlets, with 1,800 bookies throughout the united states- it just didn’t really read well.
Umunna has even attacked the industry directly with a campaign directed at reducing the spread of bookies and betting shops in the neighborhood streets of his London that is south Streatham, and went as far as to promise ‘new powers to get a grip on the number of betting shops.’
‘I know there is huge concern that some streets in our area are steadily filling with betting shops and payday loan businesses that take advantage of our community, rather than help us,’ wrote Umunna in a report to local voters earlier this year.
‘ Can anyone really credibly ever believe anything Chuka Umunna says?’ questioned Tory Party vice-chairman Bob Neill. ‘He says something in public and does another behind closed doors. Their hypocrisy seems to be limitless.’ And that is very uncommon for a politician.
Spared on a Technicality
But, fighting back in the corner for the Labour Party MP, a representative for Umunna stated that ‘this donation was made by an individual Labour Party supporter in a personal capacity, and was accepted in respect aided by the rules and properly declared.’
Officially, the donation from Goulden was registered as being made ‘to support the office of Chuka Umunna in his capability as Shadow Secretary of State for Business, and for staffing,’ so it will officially pass as legitimate.
Even though Goulden is no more head of the Gala Coral Group of operations, the ten years he spent as managing director, chief executive and chairman of the group ensures that he still provides consultancy services and chairs the Responsible Gaming Trust.
Whether it’s a donation that is completely innocent not, and whether or not the Conservative Party that are searching to ruin the promotion of a rival MP by claiming hypocrisy, Umunna was still a bit red-faced when the news broke, especially after taking this kind of hard stance against the spread of the industry in his regional constituency.
‘ The only thing we know he truly believes is that the capital is full of ‘trash’ and ‘C-list’ wannabes,’ claimed Bob Neill.
Umunna, that is considered to be a future Labour Party leader https://myfreepokies.com/more-chilli-slot-review/, has recently experienced his fair share of embarrassment as earlier this season their office ended up being accused of editing his Wikipedia page showing comparisons between himself and Barack Obama.